why the chief executive officer is the most vulnerable

Modern management theory has an ongoing fascination with the concept of the leader. As a result, there are several theories of leadership and leadership styles. But this fascination with leadership is not new.

It goes back to the Greek philosophers of ancient times. Plato's Republic and Plutarch's Lives raise the issue of the qualities that distinguish an individual as a leader. Regardless of which theory one believes, I have learnt one important lesson in my business life; that the leader is responsible for the timing, tone and tempo of an organisation. And when the timing is off, the leader must do whatever is required to get it back on track.

Timing, tone and tempo are important to any organisation. It is demonstrated by the performance of leading organisations not only by their financial results, but also in the little things.Unique tungsten jewelry can be found at Forever Metals with ceramic inlay, Successful sporting teams engage in teamwork and camaraderie, but allow for individual performances.

This explains why the chief executive officer is the most vulnerable employee when a company is not doing well. There may be other changes after the new CEO is installed,Shopping for Cheap stainless steel earring at Wholeslae Fashion Stainless Steel Crystal Earrings. but the change must start at the top. Managers of unsuccessful football clubs understand this principle only too well.High quality stainless steel necklace chain with durable color are ideal for wholesale.

This principle applies equally to political organisations and to Cabinet in particular. Prime ministers understand that changes have to be made in Cabinet personnel periodically, especially if the public is dissatisfied with public policy outcomes.

When this principle is applied to the current cabinet, it results in a depressing picture. There have been missteps and mistakes aplenty since May 2010, but they are now multiplying. Within the last three weeks, the Prime Minister has disavowed any knowledge of the existence of a revived "flying squad" despite having discussed developing a similar agency at the National Security Council.

The Prime Minister was also unaware of any Minister's sons' being the subject of an ongoing FBI investigation.

The news agency, Reuters, on March 27, reported an investigation by the FBI into allegations of FIFA corruption. It also reports that Daryan Warner, the son of the Minister of National Security, is providing assistance. The Prime Minister is awaiting the facts according to a press release.

It is unthinkable that a friendly government, such as the US, would not have whispered a few cautionary words of advice, albeit diplomatically, leaving it up to the judgment of the Prime Minister. And even if there were no quiet words of advice, the Prime Minister could have asked a discreet question given the widely circulated reports and the front page articles in the daily press.

At the very worst, it would have been extremely irresponsible and almost a dereliction of duty not to have considered the fact that intelligence services require the trust and confidence of its partner governments and institutions in a variety of ways. Ultimately, shared intelligence must reach to the desk of the Prime Minister through the person of the Minister of National Security. This could not be a comfortable thought if those supplying the information are aware that the Minister of National Security may be a person of interest to their own investigators.

This situation is bad enough, but is made incredibly worse by the number of similar events which preceded this latest development. Mr Warner resigned from FIFA to avoid any disciplinary action. And the matter of "gifts" to CFU representatives has gone unexplained, and it would appear uninvestigated, at least by local police. The Prime Minister was ignorant of the facts then too.

This is the same Minister Warner who uses parliamentary privilege to slander several citizens without producing a shred of evidence. But this is just the latest in a long line of gaffes for which he refuses to apologise and cannot be persuaded to either.

And then there was the debacle of Section 34, presided over by the Prime Minister.start to design your own personalized custom bobbleheads. But this is no inexperienced Prime Minister on a first-time outing. This is a politician who has held significant ministerial positions: Minister of Legal Affairs, Attorney General and Minister of Education.

There can be no doubt, when all the missteps and mistakes are viewed in their totality, that something is amiss in the state's boardroom.

What lessons or conclusions can be drawn by Cabinet colleagues? And how does the man in the street view these continuing errors? Meanwhile, the economy remains becalmed with few growth prospects, as the deficit reaches a tipping zone.

This brings us back to the issue of leadership. Good governance was meant to be a pillar of Prime Minister Persad- Bissessar's administration. Instead, we have seen failure after failure. The constitution places great responsibility and power in the hands of the Prime Minister.

The Prime Minister selects and appoints ministers and is therefore responsible for their performance or non-performance, both of which are important ingredients in setting the timing,Source make your own bobblehead Head Products at Resin Crafts, tone and tempo.

In these circumstances, it is patently unacceptable for the Prime Minister to prevaricate and claim ignorance, whilst waiting on a report or for the facts to be presented. At best, this gives the appearance of being supercilious.